MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4283768607 · doi:10.1183/13993003.00597-2022

The alarmin(g) effect of interleukin-5 blockade on residual eosinophil function is of clinical consequence

2022· letter· en· W4283768607 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Couillard

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Respiratory Journal · 2022
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAsthma and respiratory diseases
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMepolizumabBlockadeImmunologyEosinophilInterleukin 5Ex vivoMedicineFunction (biology)InterleukinIn vivoAsthmaBiologyReceptorCytokineInternal medicineCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Van Hulst and co-workers report stronger SOCS3 induction in blood eosinophils from mepolizumab-treated patients stimulated ex vivo with IL-33. The clinical significance is yet unknown, but it may explain some eosinophilic asthma attacks under mepolizumab.https://bit.ly/3yqp4If

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0100.009
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Respiratory Journal→Same topicAsthma and respiratory diseases→French-language works237,207→