Diabetic Retinopathy Detection from Fundus Images of the Eye Using Hybrid Deep Learning Features
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Diabetic Retinopathy (DR) is a medical condition present in patients suffering from long-term diabetes. If a diagnosis is not carried out at an early stage, it can lead to vision impairment. High blood sugar in diabetic patients is the main source of DR. This affects the blood vessels within the retina. Manual detection of DR is a difficult task since it can affect the retina, causing structural changes such as Microaneurysms (MAs), Exudates (EXs), Hemorrhages (HMs), and extra blood vessel growth. In this work, a hybrid technique for the detection and classification of Diabetic Retinopathy in fundus images of the eye is proposed. Transfer learning (TL) is used on pre-trained Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models to extract features that are combined to generate a hybrid feature vector. This feature vector is passed on to various classifiers for binary and multiclass classification of fundus images. System performance is measured using various metrics and results are compared with recent approaches for DR detection. The proposed method provides significant performance improvement in DR detection for fundus images. For binary classification, the proposed modified method achieved the highest accuracy of 97.8% and 89.29% for multiclass classification.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".