Hand and Wrist Injuries Associated With Application of Physical Restraints: A Systematic Review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
While handcuffs and zip ties are common methods of physical restraint used by law enforcement, they have been noted to damage soft tissue and bony structures of the hand and wrist. This paper seeks to characterize the safety of physical restraints by summarizing its effects on hand and wrist function and disability. Relevant studies were gathered through an independent double selection and extraction process using 3 electronic databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE, and CINAHL) from database inception to June 19, 2020. A total of 16 studies involving 807 participants were included. Lesion to the superficial branch of the radial nerve was the most commonly reported injury noted in 82% (42/55) of hands examined. A total of 6% (5/77) of examined hands had bony injury, including 3 radial styloid fractures and 2 scaphoid fractures. Both studies on zip ties noted presence of handcuff neuropathy, with 1 case report documenting severe rapidly progressing ischemic monomelic neuropathy. Overall, the use of handcuffs and zip ties is associated with entrapment neuropathies and bony injury to the hand and wrist. Further studies of higher quality evidence are necessary to understand the effects of physical restraint on hand function and disability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.015 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.013 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".