MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283777501 · doi:10.4000/communication.15300

Conversation nomade sur l’écriture en recherche

2022· article· fr· W4283777501 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Karelle Arsenault, Karine Bellerive, Louis-Claude Paquin

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConversationArtHumanitiesPsychologySociologyCommunication

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Karelle — Ce numéro thématique a commencé par un panel sur les écritures créatives en recherche lors du colloque de l’Association canadienne de communication (ACC) de 2019. Quelques mois plus tôt, j’avais contacté Karine sur une populaire messagerie en ligne : « Héééé Karine ! Ça te dirait d’organiser un panel sur les écritures créatives pour l’ACC avec moi ?! Et des actes de colloque ensuite ?! » J’étais convaincue qu’elle serait partante. C’était en plein dans ses cordes — bien plus que da...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.045
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.045
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0180.010
Scholarly communication0.0170.016
Open science0.0020.014
Research integrity0.0100.015
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.608
GPT teacher head0.516
Teacher spread0.092 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunicationSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207