Bibliographic record
Abstract
“Journey of a thousand mile begins with a single step”. That single step for a thousand miles journey, of getting international recognition for Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology (PJO), has been taken. It has been more than two years since the complete shifting of Pakistan Journal of Ophthalmology to online journal management system using open journal systems. Since 1st April 2020, PJO has been online on the first date of every quarter without any delay. Definitely, this did not happen in a day or two. A lot of hard work with sleepless nights of many is involved behind this achievement. It has been a roller coaster ride with so many hurdles. What readers see is only tip of the iceberg. The persistence, late nights, hard work, sacrifices, struggle, doubts, risks, criticism and courage with all the associated cardiac arrhythmias of the editor in chief/editor remain hidden from the readers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.011 | 0.012 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.016 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.067 | 0.036 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".