MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283781516 · doi:10.1002/sdtp.15494

30‐3: A Moving Camera and Synthetic Calibration Target Solution for Non‐Planar Scene Estimation and Projector Calibration

2022· article· en· W4283781516 on OpenAlexaff
Katherine Arnold, Paul Fieguth, Mark Lamm

Bibliographic record

VenueSID Symposium Digest of Technical Papers · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptical measurement and interference techniques
Canadian institutionsChristie (Canada)University of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProjectorBundle adjustmentComputer visionCalibrationArtificial intelligenceComputer sciencePlanarGround truthCamera resectioningCamera auto-calibrationSynthetic dataComputer graphics (images)MathematicsImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The automatic calibration of projector systems improves the possible environments available to this technology which relies on exact scene calibration. This paper explores the challenge of projector calibration and non‐planar scene estimation. This formulation assumes no prior information on the moving camera or fixed projector. Limited scene understanding provides the basis for constructing synthetic calibration targets to perform a geometric recovery through bundle adjustment. Synthetic data are generated from ground‐truth camera and projector parameters to explore the method's performance over varying properties of the synthetic calibration targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSID Symposium Digest of Technical PapersSame topicOptical measurement and interference techniquesFrench-language works237,207