MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283784682 · doi:10.1093/eurjcn/zvac060.045

Mortality, morbidity, and cardiovascular risk factor outcomes from cardiac rehabilitation, in ethnic minorities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2022· review· en· W4283784682 on OpenAlexaff
S Duggan, Dion Candelaria, Ling Zhang, Gabriela Melo Ghisi, Richard Gallagher

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Health and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBody mass indexCINAHLWaistEthnic groupPopulationCochrane LibraryPhysical therapyInternal medicineBlood pressureMeta-analysisGerontologyEnvironmental healthPsychological interventionPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Abstract Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a secondary prevention intervention for coronary heart disease that has well-established efficacy in reducing mortality, morbidity, and cardiovascular risk factors. However, outcomes from CR are known to differ between population groups, with ethnic minorities reported to have health outcome disparities. However, there is no synthesis of these CR outcomes for ethnic minority populations. Purpose The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of CR on rates of mortality, morbidity, and important cardiovascular risk factor outcomes including exercise performance, exercise capacity, low-density lipoproteins, cholesterol levels, body mass index, weight, waist circumference and systolic blood pressure, within ethnic minority groups. Methods Four electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus) were searched from February to September 2021, for studies that reported CR outcomes of ethnic minorities. Potential papers were independently screened by two reviewers, and discrepancies were resolved by a third reviewer. Data was extracted from the studies using an electronic data extraction form. Meta-analyses for eligible studies were performed using Revman 5.4. Risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane Tool. Results Across 13 studies (n = 132,109 participants), the 10,494 participants of ethnic minority groups achieved significant improvements in mortality, morbidity, and most cardiovascular risk factor outcomes including exercise performance, exercise capacity, body mass index, waist circumference, and systolic blood pressure. However, while ethnic minority groups achieved equivalent outcomes from CR for exercise performance and low-density lipoproteins, some outcomes were worse (exercise capacity, body mass index, waist circumference, systolic blood pressure). In addition, minority participants had greater reductions in cholesterol levels. Conclusion Ethnic minority groups achieve important improvements in mortality, morbidity, and cardiovascular risk factor outcomes from CR, although to a lesser extent than majority groups. Therefore, this information can be used to support efforts to improve participation in CR and prompt changes to the delivery of CR services for ethnic minority participants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Meta-epidemiology (broad)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (broad)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.413
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0260.033
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.157
GPT teacher head0.397
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of Cardiovascular NursingSame topicCardiac Health and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207