Motivação, paixão e mindfulness: um estudo correlacional sobre engajamento no esporte
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O objetivo foi verificar o efeito preditor da motivação sobre estado de mindfulness durante a prática esportiva e o papel mediador da paixão pelo esporte nesta relação. Participaram 176 atletas (M=27,05±9,06 anos) que responderam às escalas de Motivação no Esporte, de Paixão e de Estado de Mindfulness para Atividade Física. A modelagem de equações estruturais mostrou que a motivação intrínseca afetava positivamente a experiência de mindfulness no esporte. Essa relação foi mediada pela paixão harmoniosa. Observou-se dois processos de engajamento com prática esportiva, um associado a comportamento autodeterminado moderado pela paixão harmoniosa, resultando na experiência de mindfulness e outro proveniente da motivação extrínseca, resultando na paixão obsessiva pela atividade.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.253 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".