MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4283791023 · doi:10.5194/acp-2022-458

Monitoring and assimilation of S5P/TROPOMI carbon monoxide data with the global CAMS near-real time system

2022· preprint· en· W4283791023 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Antje Inness, Ilse Aben, Melanie Ades, Tobias Borsdorff, Johannes Flemming, Jochen Landgraf, Bavo Langerock, Mark Parrington, Roberto Ribas

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEuropean Centre for Medium-Range Weather ForecastsSaint Petersburg State UniversityEuropean CommissionUniversity of TorontoStrong
KeywordsTroposphereEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesSatelliteData assimilationRemote sensingSCIAMACHYMeteorologyGeographyGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. The Tropospheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI) on the Copernicus Sentinel 5 Precursor (S5P) satellite, launched in October 2017, provides a wealth of atmospheric composition data, including total columns of carbon monoxide (TCCO) at high horizontal resolution (5.5 km x 7 km). Near-real time TROPOMI TCCO data have been monitored in the global data assimilation system of the Copernicus Atmospheric Monitoring Service (CAMS) since November 2018 to assess the quality of the data. The CAMS system already routinely assimilates TCCO data from the Measurement of Pollution in the Troposphere (MOPITT) instrument and the Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer (IASI) outside the polar regions. In the global mean, CAMS TCCO analysis values are about 10 % lower than TROPOMI TCCO when only IASI and MOPITT thermal infrared (TIR) TCCO data are assimilated (averaged over the period November 2018 to Dec 2021), with the largest relative differences (11–14 %) found in the polar latitude bands, i.e., the areas where no satellite CO retrievals are assimilated in the global CAMS system. Most of these differences are due to a low TCCO bias of the CAMS model, rather than a high bias of TROPOMI. The assimilation of NRT TROPOMI TCCO data in the CAMS system was tested for the period 2021-07-06 to 2021-12-31, i.e., after the TROPOMI algorithm update to version 02.02.00 in July 2021. It leads to a much-improved CO analysis field, with increased CO values and improved fit to independent observations, such as IAGOS aircraft profiles, NDACC FTIR tropospheric and total column CO data, as well as surface CO data from the Air Now, AirBase and Chinese air quality networks. The largest absolute and relative changes from the assimilation of TROPOMI CO, in addition to the already assimilated IASI and MOPITT TIR TCCO data, are found in the lower and mid troposphere, i.e., that part of the atmosphere that is not already well constrained by the already assimilated TIR MOPITT and IASI data. The largest impact near the surface comes from clear-sky TROPOMI data over land, and additional vertical information comes from the retrievals of measurements in cloudy conditions. July and August 2021 saw record numbers of boreal wildfires over North America and Russia leading to large amounts of CO being released into the atmosphere. The CAMS CO analysis captures the high CO columns resulting from these fires and also shows plumes of high CO from the boreal wildfires that are transported from Siberia over the North Pole and from North America over the North Atlantic reaching as far as Europe, even though some of the high CO values detected in the upper troposphere by IAGOS aircraft that intersected parts of the plumes are not quite reached in the CAMS CO analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics→French-language works237,207→