MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283791633 · doi:10.1016/j.jdcr.2022.05.046

Multiple skin-colored facial papules in a child

2022· article· en· W4283791633 on OpenAlexaff
Michael L. MacGillivary, Ashley E. Sutherland, Noreen M. Walsh

Bibliographic record

VenueJAAD Case Reports · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer and Skin Lesions
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDermatologyHistopathologyPathologyErythemaButtocksAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An otherwise-well 9-year-old White male with a family history of acne presented with a 2-year history of firm dermal papulonodules on the anterior and lateral cheeks with no inflammation and no overlying epidermal change apart from scattered, coincidental ephelides (Fig 1). The forehead, back, and chest were spared. The patient had no fever, weight loss, night sweats, and lymphadenopathy. A topical antibiotic, antifungal, and retinoid were trialed without effect. Laboratory tests were unremarkable. A 4-mm punch biopsy was performed, and representative sections are shown (Fig 2, A-C).Fig 2View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT) Question 1: What is the most likely diagnosis?A.Self-healing cutaneous mucinosisB.FibrofolliculomaC.SyringomasD.Follicular mucinosisE.Angiofibromas Answer:A.Self-healing cutaneous mucinosis—Incorrect. Acute eruption of multiple papules, sometimes coalescing into linear infiltrated plaques on the head and neck, abdomen, and thighs. Often accompanied by systemic symptoms like fever, arthralgias, and myalgias. Spontaneous resolution over a period of 1-8 months is characteristic. Histologically, papular lesions show dermal mucin deposition.B.Fibrofolliculoma—Incorrect. Presents as multiple small, skin-colored to hypopigmented papules involving the head, neck, and upper trunk. Histopathology displays slender strands of follicular mantle cells that emanate from a folliculosebaceous unit at the level of the isthmus. Occasionally, the stromal component of fibrofolliculomas can be rich in mucin, but this is distinct from the intraepithelial distribution of mucin in follicular mucinosis. In the setting of a fibrofolliculoma, strong consideration should be given to the possibility of Birt-Hogg-Dubé syndrome.C.Syringomas—Incorrect. Clinically manifests as multiple small, firm, skin-toned papules at any site of the body but are prone to occur in the periorbital area, especially the eyelids. Histopathology demonstrates a proliferation of epithelioid cells with pale or pinkish cytoplasm forming nests and tubules of relatively uniform size.D.Follicular mucinosis (FM)—Correct. Histopathology shows abundant, focally coalescent mucin within the follicular epithelium along with a surrounding perivascular and interstitial mixed inflammatory infiltrate composed of lymphomononuclear cells and abundant eosinophils.1Rongioletti F. Rebora A. Cutaneous mucinoses: microscopic criteria for diagnosis.Am J Dermatopathol. 2001; 23: 257-267https://doi.org/10.1097/00000372-200106000-00022Google ScholarE.Angiofibromas—Incorrect. Usually appear as a small skin-toned to red papule. If multiple, should consider an underlying disorder such as tuberous sclerosis, particularly if they present in childhood on the bilateral cheeks, nasolabial folds, nose, and chin. Histopathology consists of a dermal proliferation of plump or stellate fibroblasts in a collagenous stroma with an increase in the number of thin-walled, dilated blood vessels. Question 2: Which histopathologic stain would detect the mucin deposition present in follicular mucinosis (Fig 2, C)?A.Masson trichromeB.Alcian blue (pH = 2.5)C.PAS-DD.GiemsaE.Prussian blue Answer:A.Masson trichrome—Incorrect. Stains collagen blue-green and smooth muscle red.B.Alcian blue (pH = 2.5)—Correct. Stains acid mucopolysaccharides blue.C.PAS-D—Incorrect. Stains neutral mucopolysaccharides red.D.Giemsa—Incorrect. Has many uses, including highlighting myeloid and mast cell granules purplish-blue.E.Prussian blue—Incorrect. Stains ferric ions to form a deep blue color. Useful to distinguish hemosiderin from melanin. Question 3: Which cutaneous neoplasm has been most commonly associated with FM?A.Squamous cell carcinomaB.Tricholemmal carcinomaC.Mycosis fungoides (MF)D.Basal cell carcinomaE.Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma Answer:A.Squamous cell carcinoma—Incorrect. Can be rarely associated with histologic deposition of mucin, termed secondary mucinosis. Not associated with FM.B.Tricholemmal carcinoma—Incorrect. Rare malignant counterpart of trichilemmoma with no associated FM. Histopathology shows infiltrative aggregations of pale keratinocytes with outer root sheath differentiation, cytologic atypia, and brisk mitotic activity.C.MF—Correct. Two main clinicopathologic variants of FM have been proposed: a primary benign idiopathic form that occurs mostly in children and young adults, with a tendency to resolve spontaneously within 2 months to 2 years, and a secondary form occurring in older patients and associated with cutaneous lymphoma, mainly MF and Sézary syndrome.2Rongioletti F. De Lucchi S. Meyes D. et al.Follicular mucinosis: a clinicopathologic, histochemical, immunohistochemical and molecular study comparing the primary benign form and the mycosis fungoides-associated follicular mucinosis.J Cutan Pathol. 2010; 37: 15-19https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0560.2009.01338.xGoogle Scholar Incel Uysal et al3Incel Uysal P. Bozdogan O. Atilan A. Yalcin B. Juvenile-onset early-stage mycosis fungoides–associated follicular mucinosis: a case report.Am J Dermatopathol. 2018; 40: e112-e114https://doi.org/10.1097/DAD.0000000000001114Google Scholar and references therein demonstrate the rare occurrence of MF in children with FM. The differentiation between primary FM and MF-associated FM is difficult, and there is no single reliable distinguishing criterion.1Rongioletti F. Rebora A. Cutaneous mucinoses: microscopic criteria for diagnosis.Am J Dermatopathol. 2001; 23: 257-267https://doi.org/10.1097/00000372-200106000-00022Google Scholar Detection of clonal T-cell gene rearrangements can be seen in both settings. Ultimately the clinical evolution of the disease is most informative.D.Basal cell carcinoma—Incorrect. Secondary mucinosis commonly observed but does not involve hair follicles.E.Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma—Incorrect. FM has occurred concomitantly with primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma in only 1 case report of a man in his 60s.4Garrido M.C. Riveiro-Falkenbach E. Rodriguez-Peralto J.L. Primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma with follicular mucinosis.JAMA Dermatol. 2014; 150: 906-907https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.9060Google Scholar Geller et al5Geller S. Gomez C.J. Myskowski P.L. Pulitzer M. Follicular mucinosis in patients with hematologic malignancies other than mycosis fungoides: a clinicopathologic study.J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019; 80: 1704-1711https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.062Google Scholar and references therein note other non-cutaneous T-cell lymphomas, many not primary to the skin, that may have FM as an associated feature, but their co-occurrence is rarer than FM with MF. None disclosed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJAAD Case ReportsSame topicCancer and Skin LesionsFrench-language works237,207