MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283792829 · doi:10.31219/osf.io/a4ks5

Analisis Model Bisnis Nascar

2022· preprint· id· W4283792829 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typepreprint
Languageid
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicManagement and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsValue propositionHumanitiesPolitical scienceBusinessArtMarketing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bisnis balap mobil Nascar seperti Indycar dan Formula 1 di Amerika Serikat pada tahun 90-anada di mana-mana mengalami kenaikan (rise). Namun seiring berjalannya waktu, industri balapmobil ini mengalami penurunan (fall). Studi ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui alasan penurunan(fall) dan kenaikan (rise) pada bisnis Nascar. Studi ini menggunakan studi kasus tunggal padabisnis Nascar yang bergerak di bidang otomotif dengan analisis business model canvas, businesspattern, business environment & value proposition canvas. Bisnis balap mobil pernah trenpertumbuhan dan sukses karena memiliki customer segments bisa dinikmati oleh khalayak secaraInternasional dan semua orang. Namun, bisnis balap mobil mengalami penurunan karena coststructure pengeluaran yang dikeluarkan sangat besar untuk maintance sirkuitnya. Studimerekomendasikan key partners menjalin relasi dengan berbagai pihak.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.498
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0840.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicManagement and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207