MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283799549 · doi:10.17771/pucrio.ana.59813

O PRAZER EM ARISTÓTELES: O CONCEITO DE HEDONÉ A PARTIR DA ÉTICA A NICÔMACO VII E X

2022· article· pt· W4283799549 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnálogos · 2022
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicClassical Philosophy and Thought
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Em sua obra Ética a Nicômaco, Aristóteles expõe de forma aprofunda as bases sobre as quais desenvolve sua doutrina moral. Nela, é possível encontrar, dentre outros, tratados acerca do agir humano e do prazer - itens a serem investigados no presente artigo - especificamente nos livros VII e X. A ética aristotélica baseia-se em uma teoria da ação humana, caracterizada por constituir-se como teleológica, ou seja, por direcionar-se para fins e ser movida por estes. É nesse contexto, isto é, investigar em que medida o prazer é o fim da ação humana, que o filósofo se debruça sobre a natureza do conceito de hedoné. Ao discorrer sobre tal conceito, expõe algumas das características inerentes a ele - seja refutando posicionamentos que o antecederam na história da filosofia, seja expondo seu próprio posicionamento -, além de propor uma teoria propriamente dita acerca da função a ser desempenhada pelo prazer na vida humana.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it