Effects of the Connection between Ayres SI Intervention and Home-Based SI on Sensory Processing, Interaction and Task Performance in Children with Developmental Delays
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: The research is to study the effects of children’s sensory processing, social interactions as well as occupational performance with applications of Ayres SI intervention and home-based SI on children with developmental delays. Method: Ayres SI intervention was administered for 50 minutes once a week for 10 weeks on 4 children aged 3-5 years with developmental delays. The home-based SI program was intervened based on the program provided by the therapist of the primary caregiver for at least 10 minutes per session three times a week for 10 weeks. The results were measured through the sensory profile(SP), evaluation of social interaction(ESI), and Canadian occupational performance measure(COPM). Results: The sensory profile evaluation showed changes from definite differences towards probable differences in the poor registration and inattention/distractibility categories among 9 factors. Also, the emotional reaction, fine motor/perception, sedentary tendency, and oral sensory sensitivity categories revealed shifting tendencies from probable differences to normal differences. In social interactions evaluation, 3 out of 4 children showed a meaningful change of 0.4 to 0.6 logits, COPM in performance, 2 out of 4 children showed significant improvement of 2.2 and 4.4 points before and after the intervention, respectively. In terms of satisfaction, one child showed an increase of more than 2 point from 4.8 points to 8.8 points after intervention. Conclusion: Ayres SI and home-based SI are proven to be affects for children with developmental delays on sensory processing, social interaction, and occupational performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".