MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283811814 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.106.l012801

High-precision mass measurement of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi>Si</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>24</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> and a refined determination of the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>r</mml:mi><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math> process at the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mi>A</mml:mi><mml:mo>=</mml:mo><mml:mn>22</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math> waiting point

2022· article· lv· W4283811814 on OpenAlexafffund
D. Puentes, Z. Meisel, G. Bollen, Alec Hamaker, Christoph Langer, E. Leistenschneider, Catherine Nicoloff, W.-J. Ong, Matthew Redshaw, R. Ringle, C. S. Sumithrarachchi, J. Surbrook, A. A. Valverde, I. T. Yandow

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaU.S. Department of EnergyOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsProtonAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report a high-precision mass measurement of $^{24}\mathrm{Si}$, performed with the Low Energy Beam and Ion Trap (LEBIT) facility at the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory. The atomic mass excess, $10\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}753.8$(37) keV, is a factor of 5 more precise than previous results. This substantially reduces the uncertainty of the $^{23}\mathrm{Al}(p,\ensuremath{\gamma})^{24}\mathrm{Si}$ reaction rate, which is a key part of the rapid proton capture ($rp$) process powering type I x-ray bursts. The updated rate constrains the onset temperature of the $(\ensuremath{\alpha},p)$ process at the $^{22}\mathrm{Mg}$ waiting point to a precision of 9%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.841
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.006
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0060.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0070.010
Research integrity0.0030.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207