MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283814793 · doi:10.3389/fenrg.2022.831245

The Energy Storage System Integration Into Photovoltaic Systems: A Case Study of Energy Management at UTFPR

2022· article· en· W4283814793 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Energy Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsNew York Institute of Technology
FundersUniversidade Tecnológica Federal do ParanáAgência Nacional de Energia Elétrica
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemRenewable energyEnergy storageAutomotive engineeringFlexibility (engineering)Energy managementElectricity generationComputer scienceLoad profileGridEnvironmental scienceElectricityElectrical engineeringEngineeringEnergy (signal processing)Power (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Energy storage system integration can reduce electricity costs and provide desirable flexibility and reliability for photovoltaic (PV) systems, decreasing renewable energy fluctuations and technical constraints. In this sense, this study aimed to propose energy management strategies through this integration, aiming to improve the demand profile of a university commercial consumer for compensation during peak hours. To achieve the objectives of this research, a pilot project was installed which included a 10 kWp grid-tie PV system (GTPVS), bidirectional inverters, and battery bank, as part of a research and development (R&D) project implemented in the Federal University of Technology–Paraná (UTFPR) Curitiba campus at Neoville headquarters. The methodology consisted of the analysis of variables that interfere with the operation of this system, such as a detailed university profile of demand and consumption, local energy pricing, PV generation profile as well as the interaction between PV generator and the energy storage system, and the variation in power fluctuations throughout the year. Additionally, a technical feasibility study was carried out aimed to determine this consumer’s optimal size through the Homer Grid software. The detailed demand profile allowed us to know in depth the peak values were above 80 kW, for university working days. Furthermore, the daily analysis of the PV generation profile confirmed that although the PV source is quite variable, the scheduled dispatch operation is not interfered by the variability and intermittency of the solar source, as the system was designed and programmed to operate in parallel with the electrical network. Regarding the energy consumed at the university, very significant values were obtained, in which the month of July presented the highest consumption for the base year 2019, with a total monthly value of 48,670 kWh. The established operating strategy for the battery bank with a 10% discharge depth resulted in a life cycle of 2,500 cycles which can extend its useful life by approximately 9.5 years. The results obtained by the simulation show different levels of energy contribution with percentages of 60.0, 33.6, and 2.7%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.679
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it