MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring for Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Vancomycin in Patients with Orthopaedic Infections

2022· article· en· W4283815682 on OpenAlexaff
O. S. Tufanova, А. Р. Касимова, С. А. Божкова

Bibliographic record

VenueSafety and Risk of Pharmacotherapy · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsNational Defence Medical Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVancomycinMedicineTherapeutic drug monitoringInternal medicineDosingRenal functionDrugRetrospective cohort studySurgeryStaphylococcus aureusPharmacologyPharmacokinetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vancomycin is a drug of choice for the infections caused by methicillin-resistant strains of staphylococci. Its use requires individualised dosing and renal function monitoring. The aim of the study was to evaluate, using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM), the frequency of reaching target trough serum concentrations (TSCs) and the frequency of renal function impairment in orthopaedic infection patients receiving vancomycin therapy. Materials and methods: the authors carried out a retrospective analysis of vancomycin TSC test results of 457 patients admitted to a purulent osteology department in 2019–2021. The results were grouped according to the number of TSC determination performed as part of TDM (tests 1, 2, and 3). Each of the 3 groups was further divided into 4 subgroups according to the TSCs of vancomycin: ≤9.9 µg/ml (extremely low), 10–14.9 µg/ml (recommended for mild infections), 15–19.9 µg/ml (recommended for bone and joint infections), ≥20 µg/ml (potentially toxic). The results obtained in each group were analysed separately. Results: according to the 1st TDM test, only 9.6% of patients achieved the TSCs of vancomycin recommended for bone and joint infections. Extremely low TSCs, insufficient for treatment of the infections, were found in 64.8% of patients. According to the 2nd and 3rd TSC determinations, dose corrections decreased the percentage of patients with extremely low TSCs to 49.9% and 41.2%, respectively. Potentially toxic TSCs of vancomycin were detected in 48 (10.5%) patients, but renal dysfunction was observed only in 8 (1.75%) of them. The authors exemplify the use of TDM to control the efficacy and safety of vancomycin in patients with pronounced signs of renal function impairment by two clinical cases. Conclusion: with a standard dose of vancomycin, the concentrations recommended for bone and joint infections were reached only in every tenth patient. There was a large percentage of patients with extremely low serum concentrations of the medicinal product (64.8%), but it decreased after dose adjustments. Monitoring of vancomycin concentrations allows for individualised dosing, efficacy control and significant reduction of the risk of adverse kidney reactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSafety and Risk of PharmacotherapySame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207