MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283818049 · doi:10.3329/jes.v13i1.60566

Temporal and Spatial Variation of Water Quality of Mayur River, Khulna, Bangladesh

2022· article· en· W4283818049 on OpenAlexaff
Md Mahadi Hashan, SM Moniruzzaman

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Engineering Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality and Pollution Assessment
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWater qualityEnvironmental scienceHydrology (agriculture)PollutionRegression analysisSpatial variabilityScale (ratio)Surface waterWater resource managementEnvironmental engineeringGeographyStatisticsCartographyEngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mayur River, locating north western side of Khulna, has enormous significance from numerous points of views like water reservoir, navigation etc. Unfortunately latrge scale water quality degradation took place due to pollution as a result of human interruption, unplanned and untreated crude dumping of domestic, industrial and household waste into it. The aim of this study are to carry out the temporal and spatial water quality assessment of selected locations of Mayur River. The water quality was found “Very Bad” in March-2019, April-2019 and May-2019 from station 1 to station 8 except station 4 in June-2019. From July-2019 to February-2020 the water quality was found “Bad” with some exception like station 6 in February-2020. For all the stations (S1 to S8) the regression equations indicate upward regression line and the R2 values show the plotted data fits the regression model ranging 34.28% to 64.21%. Journal of Engineering Science 13(1), 2022, 89-96

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.094
Threshold uncertainty score0.187

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Engineering ScienceSame topicWater Quality and Pollution AssessmentFrench-language works237,207