MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283818612 · doi:10.3390/rs14133214

A Rapid, Low-Cost, and High-Precision Multifrequency Electrical Impedance Tomography Data Acquisition System for Plant Phenotyping

2022· article· en· W4283818612 on OpenAlexafffund
Rinku Basak, Khan A. Wahid

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsElectrical impedance tomographyIterative reconstructionComputer scienceData acquisitionReconstruction algorithmElectrical impedanceTomographyNoise (video)AcousticsElectronic engineeringComputer visionOpticsImage (mathematics)PhysicsEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plant phenotyping plays an important role for the thorough assessment of plant traits such as growth, development, and physiological processes with the target of achieving higher crop yields by the proper crop management. The assessment can be done by utilizing two- and three-dimensional image reconstructions of the inhomogeneities. The quality of the reconstructed image is required to maintain a high accuracy and a good resolution, and it is desirable to reconstruct the images with the lowest possible noise. In this work, an electrical impedance tomography (EIT) data acquisition system is developed for the reconstruction and evaluation of the inhomogeneities by utilizing a non-destructive method. A high-precision EIT system is developed by designing an electrode array sensor using a cylindrical domain for the measurements in different planes. Different edible plant slices along with multiple plant roots are taken in the EIT domain to assess and calibrate the system, and their reconstructed results are evaluated by utilizing an impedance imaging technique. A non-invasive imaging is carried out in multiple frequencies by utilizing a difference method of reconstruction. The performance and accuracy of the EIT system are evaluated by measuring impedances between 1 and 100 kHz using a low-cost and rapid electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tool connected to the sensor. A finite element method (FEM) modeling is utilized for image reconstruction, which is carried out using electrical impedance and diffuse optical tomography reconstruction software (EIDORS). The reconstruction is made successfully with the optimized results obtained using Gauss–Newton (GN) algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.989
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyFrench-language works237,207