MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A High-Speed FPGA Implementation of AES for Large Scale Embedded Systems and its Applications

2022· article· en· W4283820582 on OpenAlexaff
Salah Harb, M. Omair Ahmad, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptographic Implementations and Security
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField-programmable gate arrayComputer scienceAdvanced Encryption StandardThroughputVirtexEmbedded systemEncryptionSuiteBandwidth (computing)Reconfigurable computingComputer hardwareComputer architectureWirelessOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, a high-speed hardware implementation of the AES encryption algorithm is presented. targeting the large scale and high bandwidth embedded systems and applications. The high-speed implementation is developed by employing the pipelining architectural technique, where the fully sub pipelined architecture is applied efficiently. The applied architecture is performed using the AES 128-bit data path. The fully sub pipelined architectural technique is implemented by constructing the Sboxes of the AES encryption algorithm using the BRAMs of the FPGA device. The pipelined design is realized on the new Xilinx FPGA devices, Artix-7, Virtex-7, Kintex-7, Spartan-7, and Kintex UltraScale. The proposed design is fully synthesized, translated, placed, and routed using the new Xilinx Vivado 2020 design suite. The hardware implementation results of the proposed pipelined design show an efficiency in terms of speed, utilized resources, and throughput. Comparing with previous works, our proposed pipelined design utilizes less FPGA resources, operates at high operating frequencies, and delivers high throughputs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptographic Implementations and SecurityFrench-language works237,207