MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

HRM Practices, Organizational Culture and Nurse Staffing Turnover among High-Medicaid Nursing Homes

2022· article· en· W4283826282 on OpenAlexaff
Robert Weech‐Maldonado, Akbar Ghiasi, Justin Lord, Larry R. Hearld, Kent V. Rondeau

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStaffingNursingMedicaidTurnoverHuman resource managementNurse AdministratorOrganizational cultureMedicineBusinessHealth careMEDLINEManagement

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nurse staffing turnover has been associated with nursing home quality, such as worse resident outcomes, higher rates of infection, and hospitalizations. Nurse staffing turnover can be worse in under-resourced nursing homes, such as those with a high proportion of Medicaid residents. These organizations may lack the resources to attract and retain nurse staff, and this could contribute to higher nurse turnover. However, even within this group of under-resourced nursing homes, we observe variations in nurse turnover rates. Using the resource-based view of the firm (RBV), we explored the role that both human resource management (HRM) practices and organizational culture may have in explaining the variations in nursing staff turnover among high Medicaid nursing homes. Data consisted of survey and secondary data sources for 2017-2018. Survey data comprised 348 responses (33% response rate) from a national mailer of US nursing home administrators in high-Medicaid (85% or higher) facilities. Survey data were merged with secondary datasets including Long-Term Care Focus (LTCFocus) and the Area Health Resource File (AHRF). The dependent variables (nurse staffing turnover rates) consisted of the percentages of registered nurses (RNs)/licensed practical nurses (LPNs)/certified nurse aides (CNAs) that had voluntarily quit the organization during the past year. The first independent variable, HRM practices, consisted of three sub-scales: traditional, employee-centered, and high involvement practices. The second independent variable consisted of nursing homes’ classification into one of four organizational cultures: clan, market, hierarchical, and non-dominant. Organizational and market variables were controlled for. Data were modeled using Poisson log-linear regression, and propensity score weights were used to adjust for potential survey non-response bias. Results show that high involvement HRM practices and having a clan culture (compared to a market, hierarchical, and non-dominant culture) are associated with lower RN, LPN, and CNA staffing turnover. The findings of this study highlight the importance of organizational culture as well as HRM practices for practitioners and policy makers to more effectively target their efforts to reduce nurse turnover in high Medicaid nursing homes. By reducing turnover, these under-resourced facilities may be able to lower costs and improve their financial performance, which may ultimately reduce the likelihood of closure with implications for access to long-term care. Similarly, lower nurse staffing turnover rates may improve quality of care for a particularly vulnerable nursing home population, i.e. those with lower SES and racial/ethnic minorities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.403
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.346
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFrench-language works237,207