MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283826507 · doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100279

Geographic information science in the era of geospatial big data: A cyberspace perspective

2022· article· en· W4283826507 on OpenAlexaff
Xintao Liu, Min Chen, Christophe Claramunt, Michael Batty, Mei‐Po Kwan, Ahmad M. Senousi, Tao Cheng, Josef Strobl, Arzu Çöltekin, John P. Wilson, Temenoujka Bandrova, Milan Konečný, Paul M. Torrens, Fengyuan Zhang, Li He, Jinfeng Wang, Carlo Ratti, Olaf Kolditz, Alexander Klippel, Songnian Li, Hui Lin, Guonian Lü

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Innovation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersEconomic and Social Research CouncilNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsGeospatial analysisCyberspaceScopusGeographic information systemRelevance (law)Data scienceBig dataGeographySpatial data infrastructureThe InternetWorld Wide WebComputer scienceCartographySpatial analysisPolitical scienceData miningRemote sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The advent of information and communication technology and the Internet of Things have led our society toward a digital era. The proliferation of personal computers, smartphones, intelligent autonomous sensors, and pervasive network interactions with individuals have gradually shifted human activities from offline to online and from in person to virtual. This transformation has brought a series of challenges in a variety of fields, such as the dilemma of placelessness, some aspects of timelessness (no time relevance), and the changing relevance of distance in the field of geographic information science (GIScience).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0070.011
Science and technology studies0.0040.037
Scholarly communication0.0140.037
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0210.033
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations50
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe InnovationSame topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207