U–Pb geochronology and clumped isotope thermometry study of Neoproterozoic dolomites from China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The higher abundance of dolomite in the Neoproterozoic compared with that of the Phanerozoic has been linked to elevated marine Mg/Ca ratios, and a hypothesized ‘dolomite sea’ that promoted widespread syn‐sedimentary fibrous dolomite cement precipitation. This article provides new uranium–lead (U–Pb) chronology, clumped isotope thermometry ( T Δ47 ), combined with δ 13 C and δ 18 O, and trace element geochemistry measurements for different types of dolomite, including bulk dolomite matrix (BD), fibrous dolomite cements (DC1) and late sparry dolomite cements (DC2 and DC3), in three Neoproterozoic dolostone profiles from China. The Ediacaran U–Pb ages coupled with nearly identical, low T Δ47 temperatures (average at ca 55‐60°C) for BD and DC1 dolomites, imply that these dolomites were either syn‐depositional or early diagenetic. Some DC1 dolomites yield slightly younger ( ca 20 to 50 Ma) U–Pb ages than the BD dolomites, suggesting that they were diagenetic products formed after matrix dolomitization. The estimates of δ 18 O water values for dolomitizing fluids suggest that both DC1 and BD dolomites were precipitated from highly evaporated seawater. In contrast, DC2 and DC3 dolomites filling in vugs and fractures have much younger U–Pb ages (mostly <525 Ma), higher T Δ47 temperatures (>95°C), and lower Sr and U contents, which is consistent with the paragenetic sequence that they were deeper burial diagenetic products. A synthesized diagenetic model with evaporative dolomitizing water evolved from anoxic, ferruginous to sub‐oxic and/or oxic, non‐ferruginous conditions is responsible for the decrease of Fe and Mn concentrations in global DC1 and BD dolomites throughout Neoproterozoic time. This study suggests that the widely distributed Neoproterozoic fibrous dolomite cements may be a later diagenetic feature, and thus calls into question their use in palaeoclimate reconstruction and as a principal line of evidence for the Neoproterozoic ‘dolomite sea’ hypothesis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".