MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283830062 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2207.01590

The Dichotomy of Cloud and IoT: Cloud-Assisted IoT From a Security Perspective

2022· preprint· en· W4283830062 on OpenAlexaff
Behrouz Zolfaghari, Abbas Yazdinejad, Ali Dehghantanha

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingInternet of ThingsPerspective (graphical)Computer securityComputer scienceFocus (optics)Cloud computing securityArchitectureData scienceInternet privacyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In recent years, the existence of a significant cross-impact between Cloud computing and Internet of Things (IoT) has lead to a dichotomy that gives raise to Cloud-Assisted IoT (CAIoT) and IoT-Based Cloud (IoTBC). Although it is pertinent to study both technologies, this paper focuses on CAIoT, and especially its security issues, which are inherited from both Cloud computing and IoT. This study starts with reviewing existing relevant surveys, noting their shortcomings, which motivate a comprehensive survey in this area. We proceed to highlight existing approaches towards the design of Secure CAIoT (SCAIoT) along with related security challenges and controls. We develop a layered architecture for SCAIoT. Furthermore, we take a look at what the future may hold for SCAIoT with a focus on the role of Artificial Intelligence(AI).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.011
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingFrench-language works237,207