Counterclockwise gastric dilatation and volvulus in a dog.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
a nasogastric tube, and analgesia was initiated. The dog developed aspiration pneumonia during hospitalization and became oxygen-dependent. There was no significant improvement of clinical status despite 72 h of medical management, and surgical intervention was subsequently recommended. Exploratory laparotomy revealed a counterclockwise gastric dilatation and volvulus. The stomach was repositioned into normal anatomic position and an incisional gastropexy was performed. The dog was maintained in the intensive care unit for 4 d postoperatively. Currently, 3 mo postoperatively, the dog is healthy without recurrence of clinical signs. Key clinical message: Counterclockwise gastric dilatation and volvulus is a rare condition in veterinary medicine; however, it should be considered in a patient with acute gastric distension and signs of pyloric outflow obstruction when characteristic radiological signs of clockwise gastric dilatation and volvulus are absent, and there is radiological evidence of persistent gastric foreign material despite medical management. Misdiagnosis of counterclockwise gastric dilatation and volvulus can delay definitive surgical intervention and lead to higher morbidity and mortality.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".