MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283833042 · doi:10.18280/mmep.090333

Bi-Functional Coated Tapered LPFG Sensor: Gas and Temperature Sensing

2022· article· en· W4283833042 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueMathematical Modelling and Engineering Problems · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Fiber Optic Sensors
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResponsivityCladding (metalworking)Materials scienceAnalytical Chemistry (journal)RepeatabilitySensitivity (control systems)WavelengthOpticsOptoelectronicsChemistryPhotodetectorComposite materialChromatographyElectronic engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bi-functional coated tapered Long Period Fiber Grating LPFG as a gas and a temperature sensor is proposed. Obtains a sensor with a high sensitivity is still a matter of challenge. In this work, a taper LPFG is used for sensing purposes. Besides, in order to increase the sensor performance, numbers of Cr and Al layers are coated on the taper region. In this work, different concentrations of four gases Ar, NH3, CH4 and N2 are applied for temperature range (25℃ up to 80℃). however, the experimental results illustrate that the transmission loss is reduce which means a significant interaction between sensing medium and cladding mode is occurred successfully which leads to higher sensitivity. Nevertheless, from the main findings, the temperature sensitivities are 2.9 pm/℃, 4.9 pm/℃, 4.5 pm/℃ and 3.1 pm/℃ for 4% concentrations of Ar, NH3, CH4 and N2 respectively. In addition, the gases sensitives are 0.213 nm%-1, 0.41 nm%-1, 0.39 nm%-1, 0.201 nm%-1 with limit of detection LoD of 0.061%, 0.024%, 0.032% and 0.073% for Ar, NH3, CH4 and N2 respectively. Additionally, the sensor shows a good repeatability, recoverability and stability. In terms of stability, the sensor shows a stable value of wavelength shift under different values of gas concentration and temperatures which was estimated 1.55 µm. Besides, it shows a fast responsivity with 53 s and 60 s as response time and recovery time respectively. Interestingly, with less than 0.06 nm of standard deviation, the signal returned to its original resonance wavelength which confirms that this sensor has a good recoverability. From these results, a coated taper LPFG can be a promising candidate for medical and industrial applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.342
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it