MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

La recherche qualitative

2022· preprint· fr· W4283834702 on OpenAlexaff
Jean Moscarola, Aurélie Dudézert, Chantal Fuhrer, Florence Laval, Michel Kalika, Olivier Lavastre

Bibliographic record

VenueEMS Editions eBooks · 2022
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealthcare Systems and Practices
Canadian institutionsCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des Laurentides
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)2019-20 coronavirus outbreakSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)VirologyMedicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Ce chapitre décrit une collaboration entre les auteurs de disciplines de management différentes engagés, de 2020 à 2021 dans une série d’enquêtes qualitatives en ligne destinées à observer les impacts de la crise sanitaire découlant de la pandémie de la Covid-19 sur le management. Les conditions de ce type de collaboration sont analysées puis une proposition de généralisation est présentée avec le projet CO-DATA-LAB en particulier sur le partage collectif de données et les possibilités de leur analyse pluridisciplinaire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.034
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.056
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0340.056
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.769
GPT teacher head0.653
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEMS Editions eBooksSame topicHealthcare Systems and PracticesFrench-language works237,207