MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283835546 · doi:10.1097/dad.0000000000002239

Necrotizing Infundibular Crystalline Folliculitis—A Case Report of a Rare Entity and Review of the Literature

2022· review· en· W4283835546 on OpenAlex
Katharina Wiedemeyer, Thomas Brenn, Karen Naert

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Dermatopathology · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDermatological and Skeletal Disorders
Canadian institutionsFoothills Medical CentreUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFolliculitisForeheadDermatologyDermisMedicinePathologyHistopathologyDorsumAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT: Necrotizing infundibular crystalline folliculitis (NICF) is a rare distinct entity that was introduced in 1999. It typically presents with numerous eruptive waxy papules on the forehead and/or the upper back in adults in their fifth to seventh decade of life. The pathogenesis is unknown to date, but yeast and bacterial infection of the follicular ostia seems to contribute to the development. More recently, NICF has occasionally been observed as a side effect of targeted antitumoral therapy. Histopathologically, NICF is characterized by dilated follicular ostia filled with pale filamentous and birefringent material enclosed by parakeratotic columns of the epidermis and accompanied by a mild superficial inflammatory infiltrate of the dermis. This case report is about a 58-year-old male patient presenting with multiple eruptive keratotic papules on his forehead. Histopathology revealed all classic features of NICF. The case represents a classic example of NICF and is compared with previously published cases that are comprehensively summarized in this article.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.651
Threshold uncertainty score0.727

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it