MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4283836951 · doi:10.2196/39428

Comparing Pre- to Post-COVID-19 Health Disparities Between Black and White Female Connecticut Medicaid Beneficiaries in Behavioral Health Utilization

2022· article· en· W4283836951 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Emil Coman, Thomas Agresta, Willie Frazier, Wizdom Powell

Bibliographic record

VenueIproceedings · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHealth disparities and outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicaidTelehealthDemographyMedicineSocial distanceAmerican Community SurveyHealth equityGerontologyMental healthGeographyHealth careEnvironmental healthPublic healthTelemedicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)CensusNursingPolitical sciencePopulationPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Broad health disparities (HDs) persist in Connecticut and the United States between minority and White patients, especially in access to and the utilization of behavioral telehealth services. Objective We aimed to determine the geographic distribution of HDs in Connecticut between Black female and White female adults in Medicaid behavioral telehealth utilization in 2019 and 2020. Methods We used the following spatial Connecticut data: (1) behavioral health utilization from Medicaid claims, from the Connecticut Department of Social Services, for the third quarters of 2019 and 2020; (2) mental health and drug and alcohol treatment facilities and ZCTA (ZIP Code Tabulation Area)-level descriptors from PolicyMap; and (3) Connecticut ZIP-to-ZCTA crosswalk data. Data were joined spatially, merged, and analyzed using spatial autoregressive models in Stata 17 (with outcome, predictors, and errors spatial lags). We computed ZCTA-level HDs comparing Black and White adult female Medicaid beneficiaries’ rates of face-to-face and telehealth behavioral services utilization. Spatial regressions were used to test spatial effects, which are extensions of classic regressions, that add neighbors’ effects to covariates. Results Distances to nearest treatment facility vary quite widely in Connecticut by ZCTAs, from 0.06 mile to 13.4 miles—3.5 miles on average. The overall White female versus Black female HDs in behavioral health care utilization were impacted by the distance to the nearest facility, such that ZCTAs farther away from the nearest facility display larger Black versus White HDs—nearly statistically significant effect in 2019 and significant effect in 2020. In 2020, in ZCTAs situated farther away from treatment facilities, both White female and Black female Medicaid patients had higher telebehavioral health utilization (spatial effects +1.3% points and +2.0% points, respectively, for 1 more mile farther away). The differential Black versus White female HDs in telebehavioral health care utilization were not impacted by distance to nearest facility, according to the total effect (direct and indirect through neighboring ZCTAs; P=.26). Conclusions Quantitative analyses indicate broad differences in Medicaid enrollment and the utilization of behavioral health services among Black and White female Medicaid recipients in Connecticut and that these differences were rather stable between 2019 and 2020. It appears that the expansion of telebehavioral health services in 2020 enhanced the access to treatment among residents who were located furthest away from providing facilities. Conflicts of Interest None declared.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.132
GPT teacher head0.423
Teacher spread0.291 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIproceedingsSame topicHealth disparities and outcomesFrench-language works237,207