MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284668295 · doi:10.1177/00194662221105552

Indian Economy@75: Achievements, Gaps and Aspirations for the Indian Centenary

2022· article· en· W4284668295 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nagesh Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Indian Economic Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicIndian Economic and Social Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProsperityPrideIndependence (probability theory)Context (archaeology)Quarter (Canadian coin)ColonialismDevelopment economicsColonial rulePolitical scienceEconomyEconomic historyEconomic growthHistoryEconomicsLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the largest and richest economies of the world in much of the human history, India emerged from the colonial rule in 1947, as one of the poorest countries. Much has been achieved over the past 75 years in both economic and social terms. However, many challenges remain that need to be addressed over the next quarter century. In this essay, an overview of the key achievements and the gaps in India’s socio-economic development is presented, in the context ‘Azadi ka Amrit Mahotsav’, celebrating India’s 75th year of Independence. It also summarises aspirations for the Indian Centenary that will be celebrated in 2047 and a vision of India’s global leadership, not only in economic terms but also in terms of prosperity that is more inclusive, more sustainable and more resilient to enable her to celebrate the Centenary with a greater sense of national pride, achievement and fulfilment, becoming a role model for the developing world! JEL Codes: O53, O14, O11, O12

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.069

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0160.004
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Indian Economic JournalSame topicIndian Economic and Social DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207