MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284676779 · doi:10.3390/ecp2022-12657

A Scale-Up Approach for Gas Dispersion in Non-Newtonian Fluids with a Coaxial Mixer: Analysis of Mass Transfer

2022· article· en· W4284676779 on OpenAlexaff
Ali Rahimzadeh, Farhad Ein‐Mozaffari, Ali Lohi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Mixing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImpellerCoaxialMixing (physics)MechanicsDissipationDispersion (optics)Materials scienceMass transferScale (ratio)Mechanical engineeringPhysicsEngineeringThermodynamicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Coaxial mixers have shown a uniform energy dissipation rate throughout the mixing tank and a high mass transfer rate. However, to the best of our knowledge no investigation has been conducted on the scale-up of aerated coaxial mixers. In this study, the gas hold-up profile, energy dissipation rate profile, power consumption, and mixing hydrodynamics were explored to keep the mass transfer of the large-scale mixer the same as its small-scale counterpart. The effects of the impeller type, impeller speed, pumping direction, and aeration rate on the reliability of the proposed scale-up technique were explored through electrical resistance tomography, a simplified dynamic pressure method, and computational fluid dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.541
Threshold uncertainty score0.381

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFluid Dynamics and MixingFrench-language works237,207