MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284683239 · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000009423

Soft-Tissue Reconstruction in Progressive Hemifacial Atrophy: Current Evidence and Future Directions

2022· article· en· W4284683239 on OpenAlexaff
Jad Abi‐Rafeh, Mehrad Mojtahed Jaberi, Leila Cattelan, Albaraa Aljerian, Mirko S. Gilardino

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSystemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtrophyMedicineSoft tissueSurgeryMicrosurgeryHemifacial spasmPathologyFacial nerve

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Progressive hemifacial atrophy is a rare disorder characterized by gradual unilateral soft-tissue atrophy in the face, which may also include clinically significant degeneration of underlying muscle and bone. In recent years, there has been a growing body of evidence regarding different soft-tissue reconstructive strategies in progressive hemifacial atrophy and the impact of intervention timing on disease progression. This article provides a comprehensive synthesis of the latest evidence to guide optimal management. METHODS: A comprehensive multidatabase search was performed through April of 2020 using relevant search terms to identify clinical studies. Outcomes, complications, and disease- and patient-related indications pertaining to different soft-tissue reconstructive strategies in progressive hemifacial atrophy were collected and critically appraised. RESULTS: Thirty-five articles reporting on a total of 824 progressive hemifacial atrophy patients were evaluated; 503 patients (61 percent) were managed by microvascular free flaps, 302 patients (37 percent) were managed by autologous fat grafts, and 19 patients (2 percent) were managed by pedicled flaps. A detailed synthesis of outcomes is presented in this article, as is a comparative evaluation of different microvascular free flap options. CONCLUSIONS: Soft-tissue reconstruction in progressive hemifacial atrophy remains an evolving field. Operative decision-making is often multifaceted, and guided by specific volumetric, aesthetic, and functional deficiencies. Serial fat grafting is the primary modality used for patients with mild soft-tissue atrophy, whereas microvascular free flaps widely remain the treatment of choice for reconstruction of large-volume defects. There exists a growing role of graft supplementation to improve fat graft survival, whereas recent evidence demonstrates that early intervention may help curb disease progression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicSystemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesFrench-language works237,207