MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284702162 · doi:10.3986/av.73.10

Svetolucijska halštatska kulturna skupina.

2022· article· sl· W4284702162 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Biba Teržan

Bibliographic record

VenueArheološki vestnik · 2022
Typearticle
Languagesl
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient and Medieval Archaeology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPrairie Oat Growers AssociationSlovenska Akademija Znanosti in Umetnosti
KeywordsPhysicsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Novejše raziskave na območju svetolucijske halštatske kulturne skupine, poimenovane tudi kot posoška skupina, ki je poseljevala razen zgornjega Posočja tudi Bohinjski kot, Cerkljansko in zgornjo dolino Nadiže, so pokazale, da je bila poseljenost mnogo gostejša, kot je bilo znano pred tem, kar zadeva predvsem sredogorje Julijskih Alp. Glede na doslej odkrite drobne najdbe sklepamo na poselitev teh predelov v kasnem obdobju svetolucijske skupine. V obdobju, ozna- čenem kot stopnja Sv. Lucija IIa–b, je opazen tudi gospodarski vzpon naselbine na Mostu na Soči kot protourbanega središča celotne kulturne skupine, ki je bila po vsej verjetnosti teritorialno organizirana. Na osnovi doslej opravljenih analiz nekropole na Mostu na Soči pa so predstavljeni na eni strani kazalci vplivov in stikov svetolucijske skupine s sosednjimi in tudi zelo oddaljenimi kraji oz. kulturnimi skupnostmi, na drugi strani pa indikatorji družbene strukturiranosti in diferenciranosti. Pomemben nov element v okviru ritualno-religiozne sfere pa predstavljajo arheološka najdišča v nenavadnih naravnih okoljih, za katere se ponuja razlaga o svetih krajih, kjer so se odvijali posebne vrste zaobljubni obredi. Na koncu je postavljeno tudi vprašanje o pismenosti in etnični pripadnosti svetolucijske halštatske skupnosti.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArheološki vestnikSame topicAncient and Medieval Archaeology StudiesFrench-language works237,207