MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284702986 · doi:10.1002/cjce.24529

Development of a semi‐analytical model to predict the pressure drop of clean pleated high‐efficiency particulate air filters

2022· article· en· W4284702986 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Youssef Alilou, Nathalie Bardin‐Monnier, Dominique Thomas, Soleiman Bourrous, Pascal Lemaître, Thomas Gélain

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic Precipitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut de Radioprotection et de SÛreté Nucléaire
KeywordsHEPAPressure dropComputational fluid dynamicsParticulatesMechanicsAirflowAir velocityAir filterFiltration (mathematics)EngineeringDrop (telecommunication)Environmental scienceMechanical engineeringMathematicsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The present article outlines the development of a semi‐analytical model devoted to predict the pressure drop induced by clean pleated high‐efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filters. Both experimental measurements and numerical simulations are used to characterize the velocity field in the pleat channel. On this basis, a semi‐analytical model is derived to determine the gas flow within the pleat channel. This analytical formulation is used to predict the air pressure evolution according to filtration velocity in the pleat. This model is then validated on the basis of comparisons with measurements found in the scientific literature for different kinds of HEPA filters with different pleat geometries. This model is easy to use, fast to run compared to standard computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approaches, and is in good agreement with the experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.288

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicAerosol Filtration and Electrostatic PrecipitationFrench-language works237,207