Ivory: Learning Network Adaptive Streaming Codes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the growing interest in web services during the current COVID-19 outbreak, the demand for high-quality low-latency interactive applications has never been more apparent. Yet, packet losses are inevitable over the Internet, since it is based on UDP. In this paper, we propose Ivory, a new real-world system framework designed to support network adaptive error control in real-time communications, such as VoIP, using a recently proposed low-latency streaming code. We design and implement our prototype over UDP that can correct or retransmit lost packets conditional on network conditions and application requirements.To maintain the highest quality, Ivory attempts to correct as many lost packets as possible on-the-fly, yet incurring the smallest footprint in terms of coding overhead over the network. To achieve such an objective, Ivory uses a deep reinforcement learning agent to estimate the best coding parameters in real-time based on observed network states and experience learned. It learns offline the best coding parameters to use based on previously observed loss patterns and takes into account the round-trip time observed to decide on the optimum decoding delay for a low-latency application. Our extensive array of experiments shows that Ivory achieves a better trade-off between recovering packets and using lower redundancy than the state-of-the-art network adaptive streaming codes algorithms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".