MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284880349 · doi:10.1155/2022/9711074

Two-Stage Solution for Meal Delivery Routing Optimization on Time-Sensitive Customer Satisfaction

2022· article· en· W4284880349 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Wenjie Wang, Li Jiang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceMealCustomer satisfactionVehicle routing problemCluster analysisStage (stratigraphy)Routing (electronic design automation)BusinessComputer networkMedicineMarketingArtificial intelligenceInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The online-to-offline (O2O) meal delivery mode in which takeout meals are ordered online and delivered offline is recently emerging. The fast delivery of huge meal orders for time-sensitive customers imposes great challenges on O2O meal delivery platforms. This study establishes a two-stage solution for meal delivery routing optimization with the objective of maximizing time-sensitive customer satisfaction. In the first stage, a large number of meal orders are hierarchically classified and merged into delivery bundles based on the nearest pickup location rule by applying the hierarchical agglomerative clustering (HAC) algorithm, to increase fast meal delivery efficiency. In the second stage, a genetic algorithm (GA) is applied to solve the cluster-based delivery routing optimization model to find an optimal delivery route for meal orders in each delivery bundle. The numerical simulation results verify that the two-stage routing optimization solution is effective to schedule timely meal delivery and improve customer time satisfaction. The comparison of the results indicates the superiority of the proposed two-stage solution with HAC and GA on customer satisfaction while ensuring the delivery of all orders within 60 minutes. The sensitivity analysis shows the impact of time-sensitive customer heterogeneity on meal delivery satisfaction. This research has significant managerial insights for fast delivery services of O2O meal delivery platforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicAdvanced Manufacturing and Logistics OptimizationFrench-language works237,207