MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Real-Time Performance and Driveability Analysis of a Clutchless Multi-Speed Gearbox for Battery Electric Vehicle Applications

2022· article· en· W4284891047 on OpenAlexaff
Eduardo Louback, Fabricio Machado, Lucas Bruck, Phillip J. Kollmeyer, Ali Emadi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattery (electricity)Automotive engineeringComputer scienceElectric vehicleElectrical engineeringSimulationEngineeringPower (physics)Physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Due to the electric machine torque bandwidth characteristic and good efficiency throughout its operational points, battery electric vehicles (BEVs) are typically equipped with a single-speed gearbox (SSG). Nevertheless, multi-speed gearboxes have been investigated for BEVs’ powertrain application as multiple gear ratios add the possibility of keeping the EM operating in a better efficiency region, thus reducing vehicle energy consumption and increasing dynamic performance. At the same time, driving simulators have gained momentum in industry and academia. Simulators render a faster, cheaper, and safer research and development process since it is possible to analyze the project at a system level before building prototypes. In addition, driving simulators allow the driver’s perception of gear shifting times, shift hunting, and vehicle jerk to be considered during the development phase. Combining the trends mentioned above in the automotive segment, we modeled single-and two-speed BEV models in MATLAB/Simulink. We performed a performance and driveability analysis in a static driving simulator. The preliminary results of adopting an efficiency-based shifting schedule and testing different gear shifting duration times indicate the importance of considering the vehicle’s dynamic behavior when employing multi-speed gearbox in BEVs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207