The McChicken Phenomenon: How Has English Become a Prevalent Language among Kuwaiti Youths?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The worldwide influence of the English language is undeniable, given its common use in various forms of international entertainment, social media, the Internet, and so on. English has affected many countries’ languages, and Kuwaiti Arabic is no exception, as evidenced by the so-called “McChicken” phenomenon. This phenomenon refers to the widespread use of English by young Kuwaitis who have low proficiency in Kuwaiti Arabic. However, despite the everyday use of the term in colloquial speech, the phenomenon has remained underexplored. In light of the above, this study investigates the development of the “McChicken” phenomenon. Through an online questionnaire survey and audio-recorded interviews, this study uncovers how Kuwait’s young generation came to rely heavily on code-switching in their communication. This study makes a significant contribution to the literature because it sheds light on this pervasive and rapidly spreading, yet barely understood phenomenon. Further, this study delves into a topic that highlights cross-cultural identities and perspectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".