MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4284893201 · doi:10.1101/2022.07.06.22277066

Association between nursing home crowding and outbreak-associated respiratory infection and death prior to the COVID-19 pandemic between 2014 and 2019 in Ontario, Canada

2022· preprint· en· W4284893201 on OpenAlexaffabout
Pamela Leece, Michael Whelan, Andrew P. Costa, Nick Daneman, Jennie Johnstone, Allison McGeer, Paula A. Rochon, Kevin L. Schwartz, Kevin A. Brown

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Canadian institutionsSt Joseph's Health CentreWomen's College HospitalSinai Health SystemPublic Health OntarioSt. Joseph’s Healthcare HamiltonSunnybrook HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutbreakMedicineRhinovirusPandemicCrowdingIncidence (geometry)VirologyVirusCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Internal medicineBiologyDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Importance Resident crowding in nursing homes is associated with larger SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks. However, this association has not been previously documented for non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory infections. Objective We sought to measure the association between nursing home crowding and respiratory infections in Ontario nursing homes prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Design, Setting, and Participants We conducted a retrospective cohort study of nursing home residents in Ontario, Canada over a five-year period prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, between September 2014 and August 2019. Exposure Using administrative data, we estimated the crowding index equal to the mean number of residents per bedroom and bathroom (residents / [0.5*bedrooms+0.5*bathrooms]). Outcomes The incidence of outbreak-associated infections and mortality per 100 nursing home residents per year. We also examined infection and mortality outcomes for outbreaks due to 7 specific pathogens: coronaviruses (OC43, 229E, NL63, HKU1), influenza A, influenza B, human metapneumovirus, parainfluenza virus, respiratory syncytial virus, rhinovirus/enterovirus. Results There was one or more respiratory outbreak in 93.9% (588/626) nursing homes in Ontario. There were 4,921 outbreaks involving 64,829 cases of respiratory infection, and 1,969 deaths. Outbreaks attributable to a single identified pathogen were principally caused by influenza A (29%), rhinovirus (11.7%), influenza B (8.1%), and respiratory syncytial virus (6.1%). Among homes, 42.7% (251/588) homes had a high crowding index (≥ 2.0). After adjustment, more crowded homes had higher outbreak-associated respiratory infection incidence (aRR 1.89; 95% 1.64-2.18) and mortality incidence (aRR 2.28; 95% 1.84-2.84). More crowded homes had higher adjusted estimates of the incidence of infection and mortality for each of the 7 respiratory pathogens examined. Conclusions and Relevance Residents of crowded nursing homes experienced more respiratory-outbreak infections and mortality due to influenza and other non-SARS-CoV-2 respiratory pathogens. Decreasing crowding in nursing homes is an important patient safety target beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.079
GPT teacher head0.378
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicGeriatric Care and Nursing Homes→French-language works237,207→