MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284896385 · doi:10.2172/1874786

Assessment of BQ-9000 Biodiesel Properties for 2021

2022· report· en· W4284896385 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Teresa L. Alleman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBiodiesel Production and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Renewable Energy LaboratoryU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsBiodieselQuality assuranceEnvironmental scienceRenewable energyWaste managementFlash pointAcid valuePulp and paper industryEngineeringOperations managementChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the fifth in a series of reports documenting the quality of biodiesel from U.S. and Canadian-based producers that participate in the BQ-9000 program, the biodiesel industry voluntary quality assurance program. Participants agreed to provide monthly data on critical quality parameters for calendar year 2021. The quality data was provided to a team of experts, who removed any identifying company information and provided anonymized and randomized data to the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) for statistical analysis. The critical quality parameters analyzed were: sodium and potassium (Na+K); calcium and magnesium (Ca+Mg); phosphorus (P); flash point and alcohol control; water and sediment; cloud point; acid number; free and total glycerin; monoglycerides; sulfur; oxidation stability; and cold soak filterability test (CSFT). The data was not weighted for production volume.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.272

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.310
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBiodiesel Production and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207