MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284959098 · doi:10.1101/2022.07.06.22277294

Emergency Department Quality of Care for Sickle Cell Disease in Ontario, Canada: A Population-Based Matched Cohort Study

2022· preprint· en· W4284959098 on OpenAlexaffabout
Derek C.H. Chan, Fiona G. Kouyoumdjian, Andrea Pang, Yue Niu, Uma H. Athale, Jacob Pendergrast, Madeleine Verhovsek

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Canadian institutionsSt. Joseph's HospitalMcMaster UniversityMcMaster Children's HospitalToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health NetworkInstitute of Population and Public HealthBC Children's HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmergency departmentMedicineTriagePopulationOvercrowdingEmergency medicineCohortHealth careAcute careDemographyPediatricsEnvironmental healthInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Importance Acute vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) in sickle cell disease (SCD) often leads patients to seek emergency department (ED) care. The landscape of SCD ED care within Canada’s universal and publicly funded healthcare system remains largely undefined. Objective To characterize the quality of SCD VOC ED and inpatient care in Ontario, Canada. Design, Setting and Participants We used population-level health administrative data to identify patients with SCD in Ontario, Canada who presented to the ED with SCD VOC (ICD-10-CA code D57.0) from 2006 to 2018. We derived two reference patient cohorts from the general population and separately from a validated Crohn’s disease cohort matched at the level of ED visits by age, sex, neighbourhood income quintile, geography, date range of visit, and ED triage score. Main Outcomes and Measures Quality of care metrics included the number of ED visits, triage scores, time to physician initial assessment, time from triage to disposition, type of disposition, number of hospital admissions, length of admission for those admitted to hospital, number of repeat ED visits within a 14- and 30-day time window, and number of ED visits within any 1-year period. Stratifying variables and sociodemographic data included the month and year of ED visit, age bracket, triage scores, sex, rurality, Ontario’s marginalization indices (neighbourhood income, dependency, deprivation, ethnic concentration, instability), and number of ED visits within any 1-year period. Results We identified 2,123 patients who presented to the ED with SCD VOC for a total of 18,712 unscheduled ED visits. Annual ED visit rates ranged from a mean of 2.6 to 14.2 visits per patient, with 4.6% of patients having incurred 38.4% of all SCD VOC ED visits. Subgroup analyses showed that adult patients with SCD VOC visited the ED 2.5 times more than pediatric patients, but their wait times for initial physician assessment were significantly longer (90.6 vs. 51.1 minutes, p < 0.0001) with a difference that was disproportionately larger than the reference cohorts. Males with SCD VOC experienced significantly shorter ED and inpatient stays compared to females (e.g. admission length of stay: 4.4 vs. 5.8 days, p < 0.0001), but their ED return rates within 30-days were significantly higher (0.89 vs. 0.35 times, p < 0.0001) with a difference that was disproportionately larger relative to the reference cohorts. Lower-income neighbourhoods correlated with lower acuity triage scores for SCD VOC visits and increased repeat ED visit rates at more pronounced levels than the reference cohorts. Higher acuity triage scores for adults with SCD VOC correlated with improved metrics for quality of ED and inpatient care with fewer longer-term ED visits. Conclusions and Relevance Patients with SCD VOC carry a significant burden of acute care needs, with a smaller patient subset whose high ED visit rates have distinctly increased over time in Ontario, Canada. Adults, males and those from lower income quintile neighbourhoods with SCD VOC experienced lower quality of care metrics compared to their counterparts, with differences that were disproportionately larger than those found in the general ED population and in patients with Crohn’s disease. Higher acuity ED triage scores reflected improved downstream quality of care metrics for adult patients with SCD VOC. Future work should address these identified care quality disparities for SCD VOC that remain present within a universal and publicly funded healthcare system. Key Points Question What is the quality of emergency department (ED) and inpatient care for patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) in Ontario, Canada? Findings This population-based matched cohort study of 2,123 patients with 18,712 ED visits for SCD VOC identified that adults, males and those from lower-income neighbourhoods experienced lower quality of care metrics compared to their counterparts, with differences that were disproportionately larger than those in two reference patient cohorts. Meaning Disparities in the quality of SCD VOC care with their associated outcomes remain pronounced and present within a universal and publicly funded healthcare system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.171

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.005
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxivSame topicHemoglobinopathies and Related DisordersFrench-language works237,207