MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284965896 · doi:10.1364/ol.457142

Time-domain feature extraction for target-specificity in Photoacoustic Remote Sensing Microscopy

2022· article· en· W4284965896 on OpenAlexafffund
Nicholas Pellegrino, Benjamin R. Ecclestone, Paul Fieguth, Parsin Haji Reza

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaIllumisonics (Canada)University of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFrontiers FoundationMitacsUniversity of WaterlooCanada Foundation for InnovationillumiSonics
KeywordsSIGNAL (programming language)Absorption (acoustics)Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicineTime domainComputer scienceCluster analysisMaterials scienceMicroscopyNanosecondArtificial intelligenceBiological systemBiomedical engineeringComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)AcousticsOpticsLaserPhysicsBiologyEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Photoacoustic Remote Sensing (PARS) microscopy is an emerging label-free optical absorption imaging modality. PARS operates by capturing nanosecond-scale optical perturbations generated by photoacoustic pressures. These time-domain (TD) modulations are usually projected by amplitude to determine absorption magnitude. However, significant information on the target's material properties is contained within the TD signals. This work proposes a novel clustering method to learn TD features which relate to underlying biomolecule characteristics. This technique identifies features related to constituent biomolecules, enabling single-acquisition virtual tissue labelling. Colorized visualizations of tissue are produced, highlighting specific tissue components. This is demonstrated on freshly resected murine brain tissue, clearly discerning structures including myelinated and unmyelinated neurons (white and gray matter) and nuclear structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.472
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207