Anemia and Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: A Case–Control Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) is a condition that mostly affects obese women of childbearing age but has been reported to be temporally related to new diagnoses of anemia. Despite these reports, the association between anemia and IIH remains controversial. The present study aimed to understand the strength of association between anemia and IIH through a case-control design. METHODS: Consecutive IIH patients were recruited from neuro-ophthalmology clinics and matched by age and sex to consecutive patients attending neuro-ophthalmology clinics with diagnoses other than IIH. Complete blood counts (CBCs) were reviewed within 6 months of neuro-ophthalmology presentation, and anemia was diagnosed by hemoglobin of <120 g/L in women and <130 g/L in men. Anemia was classified as microcytic (mean corpuscular volume (MCV) < 80 fL), normocytic (MCV 80-100 fL), and macrocytic (MCV > 100 fL) as well as mild (hemoglobin >110 g/L), moderate (hemoglobin 80-109 g/L), and severe (hemoglobin <80 g/L). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three IIH patients and 113 controls were included in the study. More IIH patients than controls had anemia (22.8%, 28/123 vs 10.6%, 12/113, P = 0.01) with an odds ratio of 2.48 (95% CI: 1.19, 5.16). There were no differences in severity of anemia or MCV between IIH patients and controls, with anemia most often being mild (57.1%, 16/28 vs 75%, 9/12) and normocytic (50.0%, 14/28 vs 50.0%, 6/12). However, 17.9% (5/28) of IIH patients had severe anemia compared with zero in the control group. IIH patients had a higher mean platelet count than controls ( P < 0.001), and there were no differences on leukocyte counts. CONCLUSION: Idiopathic intracranial hypertension patients have a higher prevalence of anemia compared with non-IIH neuro-ophthalmology patients. The anemia was mostly mild and may be explained by other factors related to worse health status and obesity, including low socioeconomic status, poor nutrition, and polycystic ovary syndrome. However, as a CBC is a widely available test and anemia may influence the IIH disease course, we propose that this test be obtained in all patients with new papilledema.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".