MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284970138 · doi:10.46863/ecocene.76

A Wilderness of Smoke and Mirrors: Exploring Interstitial Spaces in the Anthropocene

2022· article· en· W4284970138 on OpenAlexaffabout
Keith Langergraber

Bibliographic record

VenueEcocene Cappadocia Journal of Environmental Humanities Cappadocia University · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicIndigenous Studies and Ecology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of VictoriaEmily Carr University of Art and DesignUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSituatedSkylineGeographyWilderness areaArchaeologyClearingWildernessTowerParadiseEnvironmental protectionHistoryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monument 83/Holdover Peak is located along the international border of Canada and the United States. Situated in a subalpine clearing of E.C. Manning Park in southwestern British Columbia, this area is part of the shared traditional territories the Stó:lōand Similkameen First Nations. It was traditionally used as a meeting ground for fishing, hunting,and trading, and the present-day Skyline Trail was a well-used travel route. Monument 83 is notable for its location as a fire lookout site. The US Forest Service built a cupola-style log cabin in 1930, but an international border survey during the 1960’s determined that the existing lookout was actually located on the Canadian side of the border, so it became the southernmost fire outlook in Canada(Redwic, n.d.). Today two fire towers exist, situated in a burnt-outregion: the old lookout ontothe Canadian side and the more recently built fire tower on the American sideof the border, which is still used occasionally. ...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.143

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.007
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEcocene Cappadocia Journal of Environmental Humanities Cappadocia UniversitySame topicIndigenous Studies and EcologyFrench-language works237,207