MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284972194 · doi:10.3917/dhs.054.0333

Défricher, féconder, acclimater

2022· article· fr· W4284972194 on OpenAlexaff
Marianne Volle

Bibliographic record

VenueDix-huitième siècle · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au cours du 18 e siècle, une prise de conscience des conséquences de l’action humaine sur le climat et de l’épuisement de certaines ressources apparaît. Certains naturalistes s’inquiètent du déboisement des forêts, ou encore de la stérilité des terres agricoles du Royaume. En même temps, de nombreux missionnaires et botanistes sont envoyés en Amérique, et ils témoignent, à l’inverse, de l’extrême abondance et fertilité du Nouveau Monde, décrit comme un paradis terrestre qui s’offrirait aux Français. Cet article entend montrer en quels termes la nature américaine est décrite dans la littérature viatique, et comment les discours sur son abondance promeuvent en réalité son exploitation et son défrichement, en vue d’en contrôler le climat et de remédier à la stérilité de l’Ancien Monde.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.649
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDix-huitième siècleSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207