MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284973188 · doi:10.1016/j.xjtc.2022.06.019

A new surgical challenge: Reconstruction of aortic arch aneurysm late after the Norwood procedure in an adult with Fontan circulation

2022· article· en· W4284973188 on OpenAlexaff
Mimi Deng, David J. Barron, Kevin R. An, Marjan Jariani, Osami Honjo

Bibliographic record

VenueJTCVS Techniques · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCongenital Heart Disease Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAscending aortaAortic archNorwood procedureHypoplastic left heart syndromeCardiologyInterrupted aortic archAneurysmInternal medicineAsymptomaticAortaPopulationSurgeryHeart disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With increasing survival into adulthood after Norwood-type reconstruction, there is a growing population of patients with aneurysmal degeneration of the reconstructed ascending aorta and aortic arch.1 A redo aortic arch reconstruction poses significant risk in patients with Fontan circulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.015

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0080.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJTCVS TechniquesSame topicCongenital Heart Disease StudiesFrench-language works237,207