O PAPEL DA ESCOLA NA AMPLIAÇÃO DO REPERTÓRIO LINGUÍSTICO DAS CRIANÇAS DESDE A ALFABETIZAÇÃO
Bibliographic record
Abstract
O artigo apresenta a análise do emprego dos pronomes pessoais clíticos/oblíquos átonos em textos de crianças em alfabetização (2° e 3° anos do Ensino Fundamental). Questionamo-nos se o processo de aprendizagem do português possibilita a aprendizagem dos pronomes clíticos não adquiridos pela criança no processo de aquisição de linguagem. As análises evidenciaram que os clíticos se manifestam raramente na escrita das crianças. Quando comparamos estes dados com os dados encontrados por Martins et.al. (a sair), que analisaram o uso dos clíticos pronominais em textos de estudantes de 5° ano, vimos que houve um aumento no emprego dos pronomes clíticos. No entanto, este emprego precisa ser analisado à luz da mudança linguística ocorrida no sistema pronominal do Português Brasileiro.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".