Recommendations for Virtual Administration of the <scp>PSP</scp> Rating Scale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Our article validating a subset of the Progressive Supranuclear Palsy Rating Scale (PSPRS) for video administration1 has prompted questions about how best to administer the individual test items given the constraints of that medium and of the disease. In response, we wish to provide several recommendations below as guidance (Table 1). We recommend following the guidance provided by the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society on optimizing the physical video setup.2 If sound quality is poor, consider switching to a telephone for audio to assess voice and speech (while muting your microphone and speaker on the virtual platform). We recommend that the caregiver angles their camera to show the patient's entire body during the motor assessments, which may require moving the camera away from the patient or onto the floor. Ask the caregiver: “Does the patient grab onto the arms of chairs, peoples' arms, clothing, or tablecloths, inappropriately? Do they have difficulty letting go?” 1 = Slight or equivocal; 2 = Definitely present but no effect on daily activities; 3 = mild interference with daily activities; 4 = severe interference, interferes with feeding and dressing. This should be performed under the supervision of a caregiver who is comfortable preventing falls. A gait belt may be helpful. Use a hallway or open area if available, put the camera on the floor, and then ask the caregiver to guard the patient without touching them as they walk to prevent falls. The caregiver, in order to remain free to prevent falls, should not hold the camera during gait testing. If the caregiver feels that the patient is at high risk of falling, or must use a walker to prevent falls, score the item as 3 (must use assistance all or almost all the time). Use a non-wheeled chair. The caregiver or a wall should be behind the chair to prevent tipping backwards as the patient sits down. If the patient cannot resist using the arms of the chair, provide an armless chair. In summary, we believe that the majority of PSPRS items can be safely and accurately performed via video visits with minimal adjustments. This is of particular importance for patients who cannot travel to the clinical site because of distance, advanced motor disability, lack of transportation, or infectious disease constraints. The Geraldine A. Dolce Fund for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy (PSP) at Massachusetts General Hospital. Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study. (1) Research project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and critique; (3) Manuscript: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique. A.M.W.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3A L.I.G.: 1A, 1C, 3B A.E.L.: 1A, 1C, 3B T.X.: 1C, 3B M.D.: 1C, 3B A.E.: 1C, 3B M.C.T.: 1C, 3B S.H.F.: 1C, 3B S.A.P.: 1C, 3B N.R.M.: 1C, 3B R.B.S.: 1C, 3B F.R.P.: 1C, 3B. S.A.G.: 1C, 3B A.P.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 3B The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest. Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".