MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4284990209 · doi:10.3390/plants11131713

An In Situ Electrical Impedance Tomography Sensor System for Biomass Estimation of Tap Roots

2022· article· en· W4284990209 on OpenAlexafffund
Rinku Basak, Khan A. Wahid

Bibliographic record

VenuePlants · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersCanada First Research Excellence Fund
KeywordsElectrical impedance tomographyElectrical impedanceRoot mean squareAcousticsVoltageBiological systemMean squared errorElectrical resistivity tomographyMaterials scienceBiomass (ecology)Environmental scienceElectrical resistivity and conductivityMathematicsEngineeringPhysicsElectrical engineeringGeologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Root biomass is one of the most relevant root parameters for studies of plant response to environmental change. In this work, a dynamic and adjustable electrode array sensor system is designed for developing a cost-effective, high-speed data acquisition system based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT). The developed EIT system is found to be suitable for in situ measurements and capable of monitoring the changes in root growth and development with three-dimensional imaging by measuring impedances in multiple frequencies with the help of an EIT sensor. The designed EIT sensor system is assessed and calibrated by the inhomogeneities in both water and soil media. The impedances are measured for multiple tap roots using an electrical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tool connected to the sensor at frequencies ranging from 1 kHz to 100 kHz. The changes in conductivity are calculated by obtaining the boundary voltages from the measured impedances for a given stimulation current. A non-invasive imaging method is utilized, and the spectral changes are observed accordingly to evaluate the growth of the roots. A further root analysis helps us estimate the root biomass non-destructively in real-time. The root size (such as, weight, length) is correlated with the measured impedances. A regression analysis is performed using the least square method, and more than 97% correlation is found for the biomass estimation of carrot roots with an RMSE of 4.516. The obtained models are later validated using a new and separate set of carrot root samples and the accuracy of the predicted models is found to be 93% or above. A complete electrode model is utilized, and the reconstruction analysis is performed and optimized by utilizing the impedance imaging technique in difference method. The tomography of the root is reconstructed with finite element method (FEM) modeling considering one-step Gauss-Newton (GN) algorithm which is carried out using an open source software known as electrical impedance and diffuse optical tomography reconstruction software (EIDORS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.720
Threshold uncertainty score0.473

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlantsSame topicElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyFrench-language works237,207