MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4285006727 · doi:10.1364/ol.464434

Reducing frequency fluctuation in a Brillouin random fiber laser by a random fiber grating ring resonator

2022· article· en· W4285006727 on OpenAlexafffund
Haiyang Wang, Chen Chen, Ping Lü, Stephen J. Mihailov, Liang Chen, Xiaoyi Bao

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Fiber Laser Technologies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaUniversity of Ottawa
FundersChina Scholarship CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsOpticsFiber Bragg gratingFiber laserBrillouin scatteringMaterials scienceLaserOptical fiberLongitudinal modeFrequency driftResonatorPhysicsPhase noise

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Frequency fluctuation is a major problem in high-precision metrology as real-time optical frequency measurement is not available with commercial photodetectors; alternatively, frequency-stabilized lasers as a reference are also not accessible in most laboratories. In this study, we propose and demonstrate a polarization-maintaining random fiber grating ring (PM-RFGR) resonator in a PM Brillouin random fiber laser (BRFL) to achieve sub-MHz frequency drift, which is measured by the optical beat of the random laser and the pump laser. Experimental results show that longitudinal modes are suppressed in the BRFL owing to the feedback of the RFGR resonating with one longitudinal mode of the random laser. The BRFL shows mode-hopping-free operation over 14.9 s due to the self-adjustment of random modes with small frequency difference to thermal and acoustic variations and self-injection locking through RFGR. As a result, a small frequency drift of ∼340 kHz with single-longitudinal mode is achieved in the BRFL enabled by the RFGR, which offers an all optical locking mechanism for optical frequency stabilization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.292
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics LettersSame topicAdvanced Fiber Laser TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207