Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
VenueIEEE Communications Letters · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Technology and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of West AtticaSouthern University of Science and TechnologyNational Institute of InformaticsIndian Institute of Technology GuwahatiUniversité Paris 13Institut National des Sciences Appliquées de LyonShenzhen UniversityXiamen UniversityTechnische Universität BerlinUniversidad Carlos III de MadridUniversità degli Studi dell'AquilaDonghua UniversityNational Chiao Tung UniversityKoç ÜniversitesiUniversidade de CoimbraUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaXidian UniversityNational and Kapodistrian University of AthensZhejiang UniversitySouthwest Jiaotong UniversityNational University of SingaporeOrta Doğu Teknik ÜniversitesiIndian Institute of Technology IndoreSanta Clara UniversityKhalifa University of Science, Technology and ResearchScuola Superiore Sant'AnnaUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheKing Fahd University of Petroleum and MineralsEidgenössische Technische Hochschule ZürichJinan UniversityUniversitat Pompeu FabraTechnische Universiteit EindhovenChina Mobile Research InstituteChang'an UniversityUniversità degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio CalabriaChalmers Tekniska HögskolaSyracuse UniversityBeijing University of Posts and TelecommunicationsKing Abdullah University of Science and TechnologyOulun YliopistoPohang University of Science and TechnologyShanghai Educational Development FoundationHanyang UniversityUniversity of AkronVrije Universiteit AmsterdamUniversity of SurreySouth China University of TechnologyPolytechnique MontréalUniversity College DublinUniversity of GlasgowYork UniversityUniversità di BolognaUniversità degli Studi di Napoli ParthenopeNorthumbria UniversityCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueDeutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtKing's College LondonSoutheast UniversityKungliga Tekniska HögskolanChinese University of Hong KongUniversità degli Studi di Napoli Federico IIUniversidade Nova de LisboaVillanova UniversityQueen Mary University of LondonUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaBeijing Jiaotong UniversityTrường Đại học Bách Khoa Hà NộiPrinceton UniversityBeijing Institute of TechnologySun Yat-sen UniversityUniversité du LuxembourgUniversidad de CantabriaTrường Đại học Duy TânWestern Michigan UniversityIndian National Science AcademyNational Sun Yat-sen University
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkTelecommunications
Abstract
fetched live from OpenAlexIEEE COMMUNICATIONS LETTERS is aimed at satisfying the need for rapid dissemination of information, offering a vehicle for authors to expose their results to be used in future developments. This ensures early recognition of work. The objective is to establish a highly authoritative outlet for new results in communications world wide, presenting archival material and bestowing prestige on the authors as a result of IEEE Communications Society's high standards for publication. Emphasis is on the use of advanced communication tools such as fax machines, electronic mail, and other electronic media (including the possibility of printing directly from electronic copy). The anticipated time of three months from submission to publication would depend on the method of communication of information, in association with relatively straightforward, though stringent, review procedures; requiring referee responses within four weeks. For membership and subscription information and pricing, please visit
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Open science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.603
Threshold uncertainty score0.999
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
